I had an issue raised because of a mismatch between my document results and my facet counts. The issue is basically that there is a field that is not required and in most cases, the field is added with an empty string – which is ok as empty has a meaning. However in a few cases, the field is not added at all and this is not the expected scenario. So I needed to find out why did this happen, which means finding the document id so that it can be reviewed during indexing. Oh well..I was tired so I ran a *:* query and got all results… too much text. Query for all: q=*:* Added only the two fields that I needed in the fl field so that only those fields that I needed were shown and number of rows to see them all. This was kind of slow and inconvenient. Query for all with only required fields and all rows: q=*:*&fl=title myfacet&rows=1600 So now I remembered query for missing fields! Just use the – operator on a field name. Query for documents with missing fields: q=-myfacet:* Problem solved. Easy as pie!
I am preparing for a presentation this month on Solr and SolrNet for the Atlanta .NET User Group. Solr 5 is already out but I will be running my demos using Solr 4.10. Now that I am starting the preparation process, it really feels so good to know that starting a local Solr is SO EASY. Check out the steps which couldn’t be easier: – Assuming you already downloaded Solr (here if you haven’t: http://lucene.apache.org/solr/downloads.html) – Just extract into a folder. Mine is called AtlantaSolr – Make sure you have Java running. If unsure just type java -version – Now navigate to your Solr folder, in my case C:\Dropbox\Public Speaking\AtlantaSolrSolrNet – Type the magic words java -jar start.jar and let it load. – Voila! Navigate to localhost:8983/solr It couldn’t be easier!
I am working in a project that sounds like heaven to me. Big company, hundreds of developers, latest technology all around, totally agile and the search is done with Solr and a REST API in C# which of course uses SolrNet (who would think otherwise?) In any case, spellcheck was enabled and this wreaked havoc whenever servers were rebooted. It seems like SolrCloud has an issue with spellchecking . The problem is that setting spellcheck in /select request handler makes Solr spin its wheels for a long time while starting, and it has been tracked inhttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6679. The recommended workaround is to have spell check set up in a different request handler. But here is the problem. In SolrNet you can’t easily explicitly specify the request handler. It basically uses /select. The request handler is specified via the Handler property in ISolrQueryExecuter. You can see it in action here: https://github.com/mausch/SolrNet/blob/master/SolrNet/Impl/SolrQueryExecuter.cs I checked through many forums and threads to try to get to a solution and here are some of the threads I found: Changing Handler endpoint in SolrQueryExecuter? https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!searchin/solrnet/handler/solrnet/Kqxn68pU0uo/uG50WSxu_swJ How can I perform solrnet query in two different request handler? https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/solrnet/ZA-bv9dkh_0 Different request handler https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/solrnet/SP14XmifcrY Calling Custom Request Handler https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/solrnet/THX-ADS5CLQ http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13393700/how-we-changes-standard-query-handler […]
I was asked today if it makes sense to change the name of the default id field in Solr to something else? Let me explain. You download your Solr, you get it up and running and you start modifying fields in Schema.xml. Currently the uniquekey is called id and it is defined as uniquekey. No harm done in leaving as is. It looks something like what I have below. <field name=”id” type=”string” indexed=”true” stored=”true” required=”true” multiValued=”false” /> …. <uniqueKey>id</uniqueKey> At first it may seem like it doesn’t matter what it is actually called, however if you think about it a little bit more it may make sense to change it. Why? Simple. Because id, by being the default value may be used in other locations, even in sample code and it may have been used for specific purposes or in ways that you are not aware of. So by changing it, you are forcing yourself to be aware of where the id field is being used. It is not a huge difference, but the devil is in the details. Something as easy as changing it to look like this is more than enough. <field name=”itemid” type=”string” indexed=”true” stored=”true” required=”true” multiValued=”false” […]
As I mentioned in my previous post, I was having a chat with a search architect on C# and Solr and he was telling me how they were going to call Solr using its REST API, which IMHO is not the best way to go. I recommended SolrNet and I stick with this recommendation because you do not want to reinvent the wheel. SolrNet has been built over the course of several years, there are plenty of people using it and they have had the time to understand the functionality that Solr provides and code it accordingly. The problem that you will face if you implement everything via REST calls is that you need to take into consideration all possible scenarios, which in a lot of cases does not happen, And that’s when exceptions start to occur. In some cases it is not possible to use a library as there may be legal implications. But in other cases it is because of the NIH syndrome, or the not invented here syndrome. Sometimes teams prefer to have everything created in house. In my opinion that may apply pretty well if you have a closed library as you are at the mercy of […]
I was having a conversation with an solutions architect a few days ago about a specific Solr project with .NET. He was telling me some of the details of what they were going to build, how they were going to call Solr’s REST API for querying and …. Stop the press… Stop right there… I said…. You are going to call Solr’s REST API? Really? The fact that Solr has a REST API is massively useful, but why do you want to reinvent the wheel. If you want to use Solr from .NET, I explained, the best way is to use SolrNet(https://github.com/mausch/SolrNet). SolrNet is an Apache Solr client for .Net that allows for you to use Solr from .NET in a super easy and efficient way. It abstracts Solr in such an easy way that you basically just create a POCO object (Plain Old Clr Object – not to wrongly called Plain Old C# Object as many people do) and presto, you have functions to Add, Delete, Commit and more. Let me show you a small sample I built about a week ago in literally just a few minutes to index a few thousand mails from Pluralsight’s (the best online training resource available […]
Meetings are a double edge sword. On one hand they are very useful for brainstorming, communication within and between teams and in general when used appropriately it sparks collaboration; moving projects forward. The problem lies when meetings are misused or abused which sadly sometimes tends to happen more often than not. And that’s why I want to tell you 5 reasons why meetings suck and how to make them rock! #1 People use them to keep busy vs being productive: I’ve seen many times how people set up meetings because for them going to the meeting is the work. Even worse, a lot of meetings end with “let’s set up another meeting to continue the discussion”. This is very common among Project Managers or Product Managers. Just as a fun mental exercise, take a couple of minutes and think if you know a few. I do. How to deal with it: Make sure that every meeting that you attend or control over has a real and very clear objective. Even more, make sure that it is important that this meeting takes place. If the objective is not important or required, then simply defer it until it is the right time. […]
